Ladgac, a rehabilitation center based in Limpopo and allegedly managed by Mr. Moloto, has recently become the focus of widespread scrutiny following the circulation of a troubling video. The footage shows a young woman, identified as Jabu, being forcefully apprehended and taken from her location while walking with a friend.
The video that seems to hae been recorded at voslorus reveals Jabu being forcibly bundled into a vehicle despite her vocal protests. Mr. Moloto, purportedly the head of Ladgac, is seen in the footage verbally abusing Jabu, dismissing her attempts to explain her situation. According to Jabu, she left her family home in response to persistent physical altercations and had informed her mother of her intentions to return to the Eastern Cape to stay with her. despite her numerous attempts Mr Moloto only took one side of the story of which it was a lady identified as her sister, according to her Jabu is a drug addict nor a Junky , een though she was one of these the question still stand , does ladgac hae the authority to conduct this action, its also uncertain if they even posses proper documentation to operate a rehabilitation centre.
The incident has sparked outrage, raising significant questions about Ladgac's operations, methods, and adherence to legal and ethical guidelines.
Rehabilitation centers in South Africa are required to operate within stringent regulations, including employing qualified staff and adhering to humane and lawful practices. Ladgac, however, appears to function outside these boundaries.
Under South African law, individuals cannot be forcibly committed to a rehabilitation facility without a court order issued under Section 33 of the Prevention of and Treatment for Substance Abuse Act. This provision allows for involuntary commitment in cases of severe substance abuse disorders, but only following due legal process. Ladgac’s alleged reliance on complaints, bypassing formal procedures, raises serious legal concerns. On most occasions when followers comment to their videos highlihtng red flags the response is "Open your own and show us how its done"
Jabu’s case underscores a broader issue of consent and human rights. While Jabu admitted to smoking cannabis(Weed)—an activity decriminalized for adults in South Africa—this does not justify the violent and degrading treatment she endured. The actions captured in the video suggest a focus on coercion rather than genuine rehabilitation, raising questions about Ladgac’s motives and practices.
The forceful abduction of Jabu, coupled with the verbal and physical abuse she experienced, could result in legal charges against Ladgac and Mr. Moloto. Allegations of kidnapping, assault, and operating without proper authorization could lead to criminal investigations and potential prosecution.
Attempts to seek clarification from Ladgac have been met with silence. Neither the organization nor Mr. Moloto has responded to repeated inquiries, a lack of transparency that only deepens public suspicion about their operations.
This silence leaves critical questions unanswered:
- Staff qualifications: Are Ladgac’s personnel adequately trained to handle sensitive cases involving substance abuse?
- Legal compliance: Does the center follow established protocols, including obtaining the necessary court orders for involuntary rehabilitation?
- Ethical considerations: Is the well-being of clients prioritized, or are external pressures and financial incentives driving their actions?
Authorities must thoroughly investigate Ladgac’s practices to ensure accountability. Rehabilitation facilities play a crucial role in addressing substance abuse but must operate within the framework of the law and uphold ethical standards.
The safety, dignity, and rights of individuals seeking help should never be compromised. Jabu’s ordeal highlights the urgent need for oversight and reform to protect vulnerable individuals from similar experiences.
As public outcry grows, the pressure on Ladgac and Mr. Moloto to address these allegations is mounting. A transparent and comprehensive response is essential to restore trust and ensure that no other individuals face similar treatment. Until then, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the need for .in safeguarding human rights within rehabilitation services
Staff Reporter
