EFF Vows to Block Starlink in South Africa, Citing Security Threats, and Elon Musk's Controversial Views
Siposetu Hermans
Johannesburg, The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) have taken a firm stance against the possible introduction of Starlink, the satellite internet service owned by Elon Musk, into South Africa. The party says it will actively oppose any parliamentary efforts to facilitate Starlink’s entry into the country.
This comes after reports emerged that billionaire businessman Johann Rupert had allegedly expressed support for Starlink’s presence in South Africa during discussions at the White House. The EFF has criticised Rupert’s backing, accusing him of pushing foreign-owned infrastructure that could compromise national security.
In a statement, the EFF labeled Elon Musk as a "white-genocide peddler," citing concerns over Musk’s controversial online activity and political views. The party claims Starlink represents a "serious security threat" to South Africa, arguing that its satellite infrastructure would bypass national regulatory frameworks and data protection laws.
“South Africa can not allow its digital sovereignty to be undermined by foreign corporations with questionable leadership and imperialist interests,” the EFF said.
The party further warned that granting Starlink access would exacerbate inequality in the local telecommunications sector and expose citizens to foreign surveillance.
While Starlink has been lauded in other parts of Africa for its ability to bring internet access to remote and underserved areas, the EFF insists that digital expansion must be locally driven and transparent.
The government has not yet confirmed any formal decision regarding Starlink's operations in South Africa. However, the EFF has vowed to mobilise its parliamentary representation and public support to resist what it calls "a Trojan horse for neocolonial surveillance and exploitation."
The debate around Starlink’s potential entry into South Africa is expected to intensify in the coming months, as the country navigates a delicate balance between digital development and data sovereignty.
